If one considers commercial criteria to be something like: toolchain quality, IDE support, documentation, platform support, sustainable community, fair licensing terms, significant technical merits, actual adoption in the enterprise or research community, and commercial support available. I wouldn't say it is not ready for real (commercial) use without being objective, as you have to really characterize what those requirements are. The NIM project founder is sort of a one person show in development and promotion. This is a fair set of critiques as far as the spamming goes. > I've never used Nim (and don't plan to because I've been turned off by their constant spamming of comment threads on Reddit) but the numerous comments I've seen repeatedly indicate that Nim is not yet ready for real use. > Read the comments sections on other languages on Reddit programming and you'll see their spam all over the place. So I think you might have trouble finding any comparisons. > The only things I've read about nim have been on the D forums - it seems the wikipedia article is even being considered for deletion due to not being noteworthy. > On Friday, 10 April 2015 at 18:52:24 UTC, weaselcat wrote: On Friday, 10 April 2015 at 21:26:35 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
0 kommentar(er)
